2010-05-07 // 02:04:16
urbonek
I like it...
 |
^ [] [] [] []...Thank you...the image is a little hard to get a take on it, cause, this is just a guess...but it's missing maybe 20% of the image info to make a W..hole image. [] [] [] []. |
2010-05-06 // 15:42:14
muchj
I do not know, I did not understand anything, but i love it a lot a lot a lot! :)
|
^ Hay...Thanks, ya know doing an experiment can yield many things. It can be a thing of beauty,an abstract idea or just plane info. There's always the uncertainty principal.Thanks again for your w..hole look see! |
2010-05-06 // 03:47:33
urbonek
▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯
▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯
▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯
▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯
|
^ You have to look past the sprocket holes. It was test with the 35 mm Polapan CT film and 667. Probably not something but a experimenter could love. Because even when I finished the test..I said to my...Huh...what the...!!! Thanks for noticing. |