2007-06-21 // 18:19:32
drewbaker
wow. i love this.

^ me too... I have quite a collection of those, just never able to resist..true love

2007-05-26 // 09:18:23
Hugh Whitaker
:0))) missed the tripod of books before, they work well!!

^ you didn't, just was cleaning my lenses and thought I'd add that tiny bit of information (and amusement :) so right now I've set up the tripod (as the tower was nicely vanishing between the clouds the whole morning), and since finished, the clouds are boring... guess I'm more the McGyver-Guy...

2007-05-18 // 19:56:09
calicant
I tried last evening and the result was almost a black picture... probably I need a film scanner (my epson takes up to 35 mm only) or I'm missing something...

^ ? 79 is not transparency film, just as 59, ordinary color print. neg is only 55, for that you would need a transparency scanner for 4x5 - but 55 is black and white - so I don't get it still, totally confused now ?

2007-05-16 // 20:27:24
calicant
how do you scan a 79 non-negative?

^ ? eh..with a scanner- what do you want to know precisely?

2007-05-16 // 09:58:08
joster
I don't know how that slipped my mind! Of course you read beautiful eyes. I'm sorry, I'm booooring today. I'll just come back when I have something marginally interesting to say about your latest upload. Best regards from young mister Frog.

2007-05-15 // 13:29:57
inkaust
just wow. what a view....

2007-05-15 // 12:56:35
joster
I read that book, did you? I like "Extremely loud and incredibly close" better of Safran Foers work...

^ I was more referring to the movie, actually - and the words itself. I only read in beautiful eyes (you know it)